ninaSchnuffi
Joined 12-04-2017
57,969,534 score to level 67
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,404 0pp
- Accuracy #6,509 94.02%
- Plays #3,718 3,759
- Level #2,001 66.33
- Ranked score #3,234 564,785,650
- Total score #3,626 1,924,560,543
- Medals #112 26
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,903 1,032
- Account age #21,330 #10,040,580
- #1s #235 3
- Weighted pp #3,028 41pp
- Average pp #3,615 14pp
- Average SR #4,902 2.05*
- Average accuracy #185 99.15%
- Average score #2,717 2,024,296
- Total score #2,628 6,072,888
- Oldest #1 #1,341 Adrian Barba - Angeles Fuimos [Lissette's Normal] (25-05-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
26 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 9/13
Skill & Dedication 11/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.