Nick-Schmid

Joined 16-04-2017

Level 64 35%

53,376,354 score to level 65

Global
#884,308
Country
#2,605
peak #2,546 18 Dec 2019
pp
977pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#239 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
341,188,386
Hit accuracy
91.21%
Play count
4,245
Play time
96h
Total score
1,756,223,670
Total hits
783,217
Maximum combo
772
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
23
Highest rank
#522,011
SS
1
SS
4
S
0
S
70
A
133
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
keyboard, tablet
Followers
6
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
570
Global rank, 90 days

today #864,013

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

23 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 5/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 6/13

Skill & Dedication 11/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #884,308

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #5,056

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.