Nerolan_old
Joined 10-05-2017
55,078,130 score to level 64
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 28
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,409 0pp
- Accuracy #1,016 98.12%
- Plays #2,964 5,429
- Level #2,171 63.31
- Ranked score #3,308 544,863,574
- Total score #3,898 1,671,961,883
- Medals #116 22
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,087 835
- Account age #21,707 #10,182,188
- #1s #212 28
- Weighted pp #1,023 428pp
- Average pp #2,533 25pp
- Average SR #3,047 2.83*
- Average accuracy #1,842 96.31%
- Average score #3,148 1,654,408
- Total score #1,027 46,323,428
- Oldest #1 #1,435 Arctic Monkeys - I Bet You Look Good on the Dancefloor [Easy] (05-10-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
22 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64
Mod Introduction 4/13
Skill & Dedication 11/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.