Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,424 0pp
- Accuracy #14,226 90.12%
- Plays #2,533 6,749
- Level #2,919 52.44
- Ranked score #5,802 181,581,377
- Total score #5,134 947,961,327
- Medals #119 19
- Replays watched #184 1
- Maps played #1,997 933
- Account age #22,880 #10,674,326
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #3,559 26pp
- Average pp #2,417 26pp
- Average SR #2,816 2.94*
- Average accuracy #1,497 96.90%
- Average score #4,728 621,138
- Total score #4,880 621,138
- Oldest #1 #1,673 Mewhan - Keseran Pasaran [Easy] (24-06-2018)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
19 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
Kenji Ninuma - DISCO PRINCE 1 difficulty- Mapper
- peppy
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 2.41*
- Plays
- 761,351
- Favourites
- 1,750
- Ranked
- 06-10-2007
Camellia - Feelin Sky (Camellia's "200step" Self-remix) 1 difficulty- Mapper
- EphemeralFetish
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 7.98*
- Plays
- 221,049
- Favourites
- 345
- Ranked
- 09-01-2019
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































