Not Good At All_old
Joined 16-08-2017
6,913,149 score to level 41
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,412 0pp
- Accuracy #4,169 95.54%
- Plays #6,043 781
- Level #3,884 40.78
- Ranked score #5,083 239,703,748
- Total score #7,169 444,086,851
- Medals #120 18
- Replays watched #184 1
- Maps played #2,576 342
- Account age #22,888 #10,675,938
- #1s #235 3
- Weighted pp #1,991 120pp
- Average pp #1,484 42pp
- Average SR #1,777 3.59*
- Average accuracy #2,418 95.08%
- Average score #1,687 3,322,604
- Total score #2,145 9,967,812
- Oldest #1 #1,426 Sayuri - Heikousen [Kisses' Normal] (23-09-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
18 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 4/13
Skill & Dedication 12/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.