iQuatsch
Joined 16-08-2017
32,101,160 score to level 77
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,425 0pp
- Accuracy #3,215 96.23%
- Plays #2,895 5,621
- Level #1,464 76.72
- Ranked score #3,125 602,613,614
- Total score #2,859 2,981,706,164
- Medals #115 23
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,156 768
- Account age #22,896 #10,680,120
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #3,585 26pp
- Average pp #2,468 26pp
- Average SR #2,468 3.16*
- Average accuracy #2,185 95.62%
- Average score #3,213 1,595,885
- Total score #4,028 1,595,885
- Oldest #1 #1,423 ClariS - CLICK (TV Size) [Hard] (20-09-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
23 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 7/13
Skill & Dedication 12/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.