Islingdir
Joined 01-09-2017
26,963,254 score to level 61
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,515 0pp
- Accuracy #2,784 96.57%
- Plays #4,368 2,709
- Level #2,333 60.62
- Ranked score #3,431 509,098,435
- Total score #4,161 1,467,536,748
- Medals #120 19
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,414 507
- Account age #23,110 #10,774,501
- #1s #240 1
- Weighted pp #5,165 4pp
- Average pp #5,116 4pp
- Average SR #5,468 1.56*
- Average accuracy #1,408 97.05%
- Average score #5,007 465,584
- Total score #5,078 465,584
- Oldest #1 #1,448 Nami Nakagawa - DON'T CUT [Easy] (19-10-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
19 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 10/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.