sinyst
Joined 24-09-2017 Was SX25
53,391,257 score to level 67
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,415 0pp
- Accuracy #4,323 95.43%
- Plays #2,566 6,592
- Level #1,993 66.39
- Ranked score #3,838 413,571,545
- Total score #3,622 1,929,138,820
- Medals #70 68
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #101 7,975
- Account age #23,522 #10,898,621
- #1s #241 2
- Weighted pp #3,619 25pp
- Average pp #3,842 13pp
- Average SR #3,805 2.52*
- Average accuracy #3,132 93.19%
- Average score #3,559 1,335,916
- Total score #3,495 2,671,831
- Oldest #1 #1,437 Fish Leong - Ning Xia [Hard] (07-10-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
68 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 1/22
Hush-Hush 11/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64
Mod Introduction 10/13
Skill & Dedication 43/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.