[ Blackout ]

Joined 29-09-2017 Was _XRay_

Level 97 36%

1,885,546,856 score to level 98

Global
-
Country
-
peak #217 5 Aug 2019
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
2,270,295,976
Hit accuracy
95.45%
Play count
13,451
Play time
196h
Total score
10,610,849,449
Total hits
2,471,138
Maximum combo
1,489
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
36
Highest rank
#46,918
SS
1
SS
23
S
2
S
141
A
437
About
read 18d ago
Playstyle
keyboard, tablet
Followers
10
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
1,821
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #135,450

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

36 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 8/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 4/64

Mod Introduction 5/13

Skill & Dedication 19/96

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #739

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.