wulpi
Joined 25-10-2017 Was walpert
86,275,350,755 score to level 101
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 10
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,383 0pp
- Accuracy #142 99.17%
- Plays #399 34,429
- Level #153 100.13
- Ranked score #518 6,209,131,295
- Total score #392 40,655,840,071
- Medals #107 31
- Replays watched #184 1
- Maps played #686 3,234
- Account age #24,014 #11,059,652
- #1s #230 10
- Weighted pp #507 1,311pp
- Average pp #181 155pp
- Average SR #304 5.30*
- Average accuracy #1,047 97.58%
- Average score #319 9,243,583
- Total score #693 92,435,832
- Oldest #1 #2,259 Wang Qiang - Qiu Tian Bu Hui Lai [Hard] (07-04-2020)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
31 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 19/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.