Lamasticocotier
Joined 04-10-2011
48,988,186 score to level 53
- Global
- #742,548
- pp
- 1,270pp
- Swiss #1s
- 10
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #2,273 1,270pp
- Global rank #2,283 #742,548
- Accuracy #1,848 97.36%
- Plays #4,479 2,544
- Level #2,946 52.10
- Ranked score #4,854 264,875,783
- Total score #5,181 929,391,814
- Medals #127 11
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,714 205
- Account age #885 #1,130,420
- #1s #230 10
- Weighted pp #1,508 219pp
- Average pp #2,484 25pp
- Average SR #2,593 3.09*
- Average accuracy #2,890 93.96%
- Average score #4,092 1,001,910
- Total score #2,145 10,019,104
- Oldest #1 #202 Tomoko Sasaki - 2:00 a.m. [Hard] (11-03-2012)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
11 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.