Nikashi15

Joined 28-12-2017

Level 35 81%

4,619,522 score to level 36

Global
#1,364,566
Country
#3,808
peak #4,829 27 May 2019
pp
397pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#245 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
37,591,160
Hit accuracy
92.07%
Play count
1,923
Play time
24h
Total score
299,880,478
Total hits
170,295
Maximum combo
392
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
9
Highest rank
#723,154
SS
0
SS
1
S
0
S
10
A
29
About
read 32d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
127
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,308,427

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

9 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 5/96

Rank history

01-10-2026 #1,364,566

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #10,082

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.