siege_2k
Joined 04-01-2018
48,666,253 score to level 62
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,530 0pp
- Accuracy #5,018 94.95%
- Plays #5,259 1,598
- Level #2,298 61.35
- Ranked score #3,256 561,395,360
- Total score #4,098 1,520,863,751
- Medals #108 31
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,571 352
- Account age #25,330 #11,478,343
- #1s #239 1
- Weighted pp #3,880 20pp
- Average pp #3,003 20pp
- Average SR #4,511 2.25*
- Average accuracy #84 99.51%
- Average score #3,932 1,098,653
- Total score #4,415 1,098,653
- Oldest #1 #1,720 Jan Wayne Vs. Raindropz - Numb (Nightcore Ver.) [Garven's Easy] (27-07-2018)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
31 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 8/13
Skill & Dedication 17/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.