MCPGamer

Joined 25-01-2018

Level 52 71%

15,813,462 score to level 53

Global
#908,551
Country
#2,667
peak #2,239 28 Nov 2018
pp
935pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#244 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
222,620,820
Hit accuracy
90.70%
Play count
5,197
Play time
65h
Total score
962,566,538
Total hits
548,647
Maximum combo
730
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
23
Highest rank
#368,997
SS
0
SS
10
S
0
S
36
A
90
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
7
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
695
Global rank, 90 days

today #887,596

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

23 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 5/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 5/13

Skill & Dedication 12/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #908,551

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #5,259

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.