okrplay

Joined 27-01-2018

Level 59 78%

14,929,437 score to level 60

Global
#653,496
Country
#2,009
peak #2,012 10 Mar 2021
pp
1,494pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#237 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
276,563,163
Hit accuracy
93.10%
Play count
2,987
Play time
57h
Total score
1,406,970,564
Total hits
491,882
Maximum combo
766
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
22
Highest rank
#447,758
SS
1
SS
15
S
0
S
61
A
76
About
read 2d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
424
Global rank, 90 days

today #652,586

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

22 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 6/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 4/13

Skill & Dedication 11/96

Rank history

19-09-2026 #653,496

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #3,436

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.