MrLayle

Joined 06-03-2018 Was Snapchat

Level 91 10%

222,098,629 score to level 92

Global
-
Country
-
peak #140 27 Jul 2018
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#238 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
1,724,577,250
Hit accuracy
96.31%
Play count
10,524
Play time
150h
Total score
5,111,025,867
Total hits
1,372,215
Maximum combo
2,215
Replays watched by others
20
Medals
9
Highest rank
#18,163
SS
0
SS
2
S
0
S
9
A
35
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
keyboard, tablet
Followers
19
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
2,290
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #529,886

Play history
Replays watched

Swiss ranks

Medals

9 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 1/13

Skill & Dedication 6/96

Rank history

26-07-2018 #28,003

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #556

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.