Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,404 0pp
- Accuracy #13,981 90.23%
- Plays #4,718 2,213
- Level #2,698 55.45
- Ranked score #3,939 398,157,484
- Total score #4,756 1,121,592,953
- Medals #114 24
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,398 518
- Account age #27,013 #12,027,070
- #1s #237 1
- Weighted pp #4,222 14pp
- Average pp #3,637 14pp
- Average SR #4,481 2.25*
- Average accuracy #197 99.11%
- Average score #1,957 2,907,377
- Total score #3,410 2,907,377
- Oldest #1 #1,745 T-POCKET - 1925 (Kagamine Len Vocal Ver.) [Normal] (18-08-2018)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
24 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 6/13
Skill & Dedication 14/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
nowisee - confusion 8 difficulties- Mapper
- hot anime girl
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 6.35*
- Plays
- 1,101,195
- Favourites
- 1,269
- Ranked
- 06-04-2018
kozato - Shijuugo-nen no Yukizakura 5 difficulties- Mapper
- Muya
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 6.32*
- Plays
- 689,184
- Favourites
- 445
- Ranked
- 20-06-2018
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































