Gery
Joined 15-04-2018 Was aquageryl
0 score to level 80
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,409 0pp
- Accuracy #3,551 95.98%
- Plays #1,852 9,693
- Level #1,317 79.90
- Ranked score #5,434 209,417,917
- Total score #2,660 3,405,834,708
- Medals #116 22
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,181 738
- Account age #27,209 #12,095,261
- #1s #237 1
- Weighted pp #5,031 5pp
- Average pp #4,947 5pp
- Average SR #1,734 3.61*
- Average accuracy #4,953 75.13%
- Average score #1,857 3,047,016
- Total score #3,366 3,047,016
- Oldest #1 #1,662 Aimer - Kyoukara Omoide [Another night spent crying until I fall asleep] (17-06-2018)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
22 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 4/13
Skill & Dedication 14/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.