kevinaness

Joined 30-04-2018

Level 68 15%

78,749,224 score to level 69

Global
#684,675
Country
#2,030
peak #1,940 1 Jan 2021
pp
1,409pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#239 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
356,247,125
Hit accuracy
93.96%
Play count
2,245
Play time
53h
Total score
2,087,391,024
Total hits
577,742
Maximum combo
1,046
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
14
Highest rank
#409,467
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
22
A
77
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
217
Global rank, 90 days

today #669,531

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

14 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 0/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 3/13

Skill & Dedication 10/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #684,675

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #3,575

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.