tractemis
Joined 23-07-2018
2,324,546 score to level 23
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,422 0pp
- Accuracy #28,880 83.58%
- Plays #6,298 521
- Level #5,630 22.76
- Ranked score #11,302 37,892,986
- Total score #14,278 76,105,454
- Medals #128 10
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,707 212
- Account age #28,697 #12,718,295
- #1s #240 3
- Weighted pp #4,538 10pp
- Average pp #5,187 3pp
- Average SR #4,172 2.38*
- Average accuracy #4,743 80.51%
- Average score #5,173 366,543
- Total score #4,399 1,099,630
- Oldest #1 #3,467 MIHARU - Yakkami-Okami [Normal] (14-09-2022)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
10 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 2/13
Skill & Dedication 5/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.