Cyther15
Joined 30-07-2018 Was Neeep Neeep
92,041,152 score to level 84
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 3
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,402 0pp
- Accuracy #7,415 93.49%
- Plays #2,293 7,582
- Level #1,175 83.33
- Ranked score #1,813 1,458,721,545
- Total score #2,498 3,825,571,672
- Medals #116 22
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,264 1,850
- Account age #28,765 #12,764,445
- #1s #237 3
- Weighted pp #2,465 72pp
- Average pp #2,524 25pp
- Average SR #3,464 2.65*
- Average accuracy #142 99.29%
- Average score #2,852 1,901,041
- Total score #2,693 5,703,124
- Oldest #1 #1,767 Blend A - Bon Appetit S (TV Size ver) [Easy] (16-09-2018)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
22 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 4/13
Skill & Dedication 14/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.