Sleepydays

Joined 30-07-2018

Level 64 79%

16,840,853 score to level 65

Global
#849,948
Country
#2,604
peak #3,528 22 Nov 2020
pp
1,042pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#243 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
286,125,452
Hit accuracy
92.46%
Play count
3,901
Play time
70h
Total score
1,792,759,171
Total hits
624,032
Maximum combo
960
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
15
Highest rank
#762,139
SS
0
SS
1
S
0
S
24
A
51
About
read 19d ago
Playstyle
mouse
Followers
4
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
309
Global rank, 90 days

today #830,532

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

15 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 0/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 4/13

Skill & Dedication 10/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #849,948

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #4,784

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.