Hoxxor
Joined 11-08-2018
7,492,998 score to level 36
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,562 0pp
- Accuracy #6,068 94.28%
- Plays #5,863 984
- Level #4,348 35.69
- Ranked score #6,254 153,838,508
- Total score #8,486 297,007,002
- Medals #129 10
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,588 339
- Account age #29,009 #12,849,976
- #1s #241 2
- Weighted pp #4,165 15pp
- Average pp #4,550 8pp
- Average SR #4,683 2.16*
- Average accuracy #3,062 93.45%
- Average score #3,594 1,322,107
- Total score #3,526 2,644,213
- Oldest #1 #1,738 Nicholas Teo - Dang Ni Gu Dan Ni Hui Xiang Qi Shui [Normal] (11-08-2018)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
10 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 6/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.