Chatontst
Joined 27-12-2011
31,056,143 score to level 45
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,412 0pp
- Accuracy #2,612 96.70%
- Plays #4,775 2,144
- Level #3,580 44.19
- Ranked score #6,289 150,588,807
- Total score #6,479 566,243,857
- Medals #135 3
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,851 67
- Account age #1,050 #1,290,822
- #1s #236 2
- Weighted pp #3,183 37pp
- Average pp #3,140 18pp
- Average SR #4,699 2.15*
- Average accuracy #709 98.12%
- Average score #5,091 417,471
- Total score #4,648 834,941
- Oldest #1 #182 Ayana Taketatsu & Yuiko Tatsumi - Balance KISS (TV Size) [Easy] (19-01-2012)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
3 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 2/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.