saiderking

Joined 07-09-2018

Level 90 44%

115,455,382 score to level 91

Global
#624,146
Country
#1,887
peak #2,106 9 Jul 2021
pp
1,574pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
1,132,752,047
Hit accuracy
94.21%
Play count
12,259
Play time
212h
Total score
4,969,208,227
Total hits
2,088,386
Maximum combo
804
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
36
Highest rank
#440,710
SS
0
SS
1
S
4
S
65
A
432
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
1,508
Global rank, 90 days

today #610,716

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

36 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 10/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64

Mod Introduction 8/13

Skill & Dedication 15/96

Rank history

18-09-2026 #624,146

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #3,210

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.