Andic

Joined 01-11-2018

Level 53 32%

38,144,185 score to level 54

Global
-
Country
-
peak #2,312 19 Sept 2019
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#243 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
365,700,312
Hit accuracy
94.62%
Play count
2,835
Play time
57h
Total score
996,945,815
Total hits
390,524
Maximum combo
802
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
24
Highest rank
#477,698
SS
0
SS
10
S
0
S
121
A
122
About
read 28d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
432
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #768,309

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

24 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 7/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 6/13

Skill & Dedication 9/96

Rank history

12-01-2026 #818,300

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #5,572

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.