Patrick647

Joined 15-11-2018

Level 50 58%

20,906,315 score to level 51

Global
#804,111
Country
#2,461
peak #3,830 23 Jan 2021
pp
1,131pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#238 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
148,136,223
Hit accuracy
83.58%
Play count
4,542
Play time
48h
Total score
850,343,685
Total hits
559,578
Maximum combo
448
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
18
Highest rank
#711,934
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
8
A
26
About
read 19d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
3
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
686
Global rank, 90 days

today #786,980

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

18 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 3/13

Skill & Dedication 12/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #804,111

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #4,441

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.