iTRAOZ

Joined 24-01-2019

Level 37 47%

14,521,580 score to level 38

Global
-
Country
-
peak #4,106 27 Jul 2019
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#243 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
68,995,321
Hit accuracy
97.73%
Play count
1,054
Play time
24h
Total score
344,008,420
Total hits
104,464
Maximum combo
732
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
17
Highest rank
#709,075
SS
2
SS
15
S
0
S
53
A
5
About
read 29d ago
Playstyle
mouse
Followers
2
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
113
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #1,259,889

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

17 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 3/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 5/13

Skill & Dedication 7/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #10,078

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.