Ecrofer
Joined 09-02-2019
1,564,604,445 score to level 97
- Global
- #288,937
- pp
- 3,039pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #957 3,039pp
- Global rank #959 #288,937
- Accuracy #2,863 96.51%
- Plays #1,389 12,892
- Level #518 96.09
- Ranked score #2,459 922,511,522
- Total score #1,531 7,955,990,169
- Medals #107 31
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,089 833
- Account age #31,803 #13,911,887
- #1s #237 2
- Weighted pp #2,199 97pp
- Average pp #1,222 49pp
- Average SR #939 4.35*
- Average accuracy #2,746 94.34%
- Average score #865 5,515,455
- Total score #2,067 11,030,909
- Oldest #1 #2,571 MAMI - Kaze no Uta [maki's Normal] (16-01-2021)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
31 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 19/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.