daq57199
Joined 09-03-2019
9,815,944 score to level 24
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,550 0pp
- Accuracy #3,758 95.82%
- Plays #6,282 556
- Level #5,600 23.09
- Ranked score #11,139 39,601,891
- Total score #14,101 79,424,056
- Medals #131 8
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,689 236
- Account age #32,147 #14,064,998
- #1s #243 1
- Weighted pp #4,921 6pp
- Average pp #4,805 6pp
- Average SR #5,254 1.83*
- Average accuracy #1,851 96.30%
- Average score #4,354 842,168
- Total score #4,651 842,168
- Oldest #1 #1,917 Sasaki Sayaka - Distance [Normal] (16-03-2019)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
8 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 2/13
Skill & Dedication 4/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.