theotaz
Joined 28-02-2012
2,788,428 score to level 21
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,587 0pp
- Accuracy #12,041 91.11%
- Plays #6,528 331
- Level #5,850 20.65
- Ranked score #14,062 21,874,562
- Total score #15,924 56,711,572
- Medals #137 2
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,899 25
- Account age #1,207 #1,430,913
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #5,201 4pp
- Average pp #5,160 4pp
- Average SR #5,284 1.80*
- Average accuracy #2,556 94.84%
- Average score #4,903 524,609
- Total score #4,999 524,609
- Oldest #1 #194 La Oreja De Van Gogh - Cuidate [Easy] (01-03-2012)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 0/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 2/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.