Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,580 0pp
- Accuracy #15,897 89.34%
- Plays #6,334 525
- Level #5,474 24.35
- Ranked score #12,235 31,395,479
- Total score #13,210 93,778,785
- Medals #138 1
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,911 12
- Account age #70 #149,287
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #4,724 8pp
- Average pp #4,501 8pp
- Average SR #2,569 3.10*
- Average accuracy #4,720 81.22%
- Average score #4,673 660,844
- Total score #4,839 660,844
- Oldest #1 #6 Patrick Phelan (daXX remix) - Lotus III Intro [Advanced] (05-10-2009)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
1 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 0/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
COOL&CREATE - Help me, ERINNNNNN!! 3 difficulties- Mapper
- Doomsday93
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 4.87*
- Plays
- 360,122
- Favourites
- 267
- Ranked
- 04-03-2009
Ichiko Furukawa, Makoto Tonosu - The Law of the Battle 3 difficulties- Mapper
- supergarlic
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 4.50*
- Plays
- 65,700
- Favourites
- 19
- Ranked
- 10-03-2009
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































