zacbarker12

Joined 10-08-2019

Level 76 71%

32,781,466 score to level 77

Global
#376,406
Country
#1,216
peak #1,784 26 Aug 2026
pp
2,523pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
412,947,897
Hit accuracy
90.82%
Play count
6,553
Play time
104h
Total score
2,981,025,858
Total hits
1,264,399
Maximum combo
735
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
32
Highest rank
#351,479
SS
0
SS
4
S
1
S
28
A
106
About
read 18d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
11
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
647
Global rank, 90 days

today #369,215

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

32 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 6/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 4/13

Skill & Dedication 20/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #376,406

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #1,787

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.