Senko-San2006

Joined 30-08-2019

Level 48 45%

25,544,234 score to level 49

Global
#834,502
Country
#2,556
peak #3,744 1 Jul 2020
pp
1,070pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
248,692,129
Hit accuracy
84.29%
Play count
3,003
Play time
51h
Total score
746,695,766
Total hits
492,767
Maximum combo
492
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
38
Highest rank
#738,387
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
2
A
39
About
read 18d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
4
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
1,665
Global rank, 90 days

today #816,599

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

38 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 8/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 3/64

Mod Introduction 9/13

Skill & Dedication 18/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #834,502

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #4,682

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.