aliciapom
Joined 31-08-2019
10,078,233 score to level 51
- Global
- #868,717
- pp
- 1,011pp
- Swiss #1s
- 6
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #2,650 1,011pp
- Global rank #2,659 #868,717
- Accuracy #714 98.42%
- Plays #5,153 1,727
- Level #3,051 50.80
- Ranked score #4,157 358,150,349
- Total score #5,377 861,171,767
- Medals #110 28
- Replays watched #186 0
- Maps played #2,185 735
- Account age #35,039 #15,101,150
- #1s #231 6
- Weighted pp #1,815 147pp
- Average pp #2,325 27pp
- Average SR #3,727 2.55*
- Average accuracy #229 99.05%
- Average score #3,008 1,776,278
- Total score #2,091 10,657,666
- Oldest #1 #2,613 TWICE - FANCY [Easy] (15-02-2021)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
28 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 5/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 8/13
Skill & Dedication 14/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.