xalxal
Joined 08-09-2019
8,706,821 score to level 31
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,412 0pp
- Accuracy #30,405 82.89%
- Plays #5,980 844
- Level #4,852 30.52
- Ranked score #9,046 64,859,912
- Total score #10,179 185,043,179
- Medals #133 5
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,621 297
- Account age #35,189 #15,150,931
- #1s #237 1
- Weighted pp #4,921 6pp
- Average pp #4,806 6pp
- Average SR #570 4.83*
- Average accuracy #5,185 51.34%
- Average score #5,505 65,249
- Total score #5,508 65,249
- Oldest #1 #2,814 Oomori Seiko - JUSTadICE (TV Size) [Another] (20-05-2021)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
5 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 3/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.