Nanami42
Joined 09-04-2012
6,348,139 score to level 34
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,587 0pp
- Accuracy #1,007 98.12%
- Plays #5,655 1,209
- Level #4,556 33.71
- Ranked score #7,196 113,206,216
- Total score #9,090 249,841,861
- Medals #136 3
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,830 94
- Account age #1,321 #1,523,065
- #1s #241 1
- Weighted pp #4,397 12pp
- Average pp #3,949 12pp
- Average SR #5,248 1.83*
- Average accuracy #1 100.00%
- Average score #4,858 553,237
- Total score #4,963 553,237
- Oldest #1 #236 Wakaba - Ashita, Boku wa Kimi ni Ai ni Yuku (TV Size) [Normal] (06-06-2012)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
3 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.