Akjo
Joined 18-12-2019
48,442,653 score to level 51
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,567 0pp
- Accuracy #6,424 94.07%
- Plays #4,604 2,395
- Level #3,097 50.04
- Ranked score #5,640 194,503,327
- Total score #5,499 822,807,347
- Medals #107 32
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,631 296
- Account age #37,377 #15,784,926
- #1s #242 2
- Weighted pp #3,383 31pp
- Average pp #3,471 16pp
- Average SR #4,282 2.34*
- Average accuracy #971 97.70%
- Average score #2,264 2,532,406
- Total score #2,830 5,064,812
- Oldest #1 #3,267 Nardis - HAPPY [Pennek's Normal: AMUSED] (19-03-2022)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
32 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 11/13
Skill & Dedication 15/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.