byJassTV
Joined 08-01-2020
37,245,009 score to level 69
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,424 0pp
- Accuracy #6,945 93.77%
- Plays #3,197 4,869
- Level #1,884 68.60
- Ranked score #2,939 672,719,789
- Total score #3,467 2,128,895,239
- Medals #120 18
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,159 764
- Account age #37,830 #15,939,760
- #1s #243 1
- Weighted pp #3,435 29pp
- Average pp #2,171 29pp
- Average SR #1,882 3.53*
- Average accuracy #3,510 91.71%
- Average score #1,766 3,179,103
- Total score #3,319 3,179,103
- Oldest #1 #3,814 Masayoshi Soken - Insatiable [Hard] (05-12-2023)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
18 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 6/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 3/13
Skill & Dedication 8/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.