Arkys_old
Joined 04-06-2012
6,579,302 score to level 31
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,589 0pp
- Accuracy #2,763 96.58%
- Plays #6,063 797
- Level #4,855 30.64
- Ranked score #9,316 60,480,733
- Total score #10,168 187,170,698
- Medals #137 2
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,856 66
- Account age #1,477 #1,649,541
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #4,325 13pp
- Average pp #3,815 13pp
- Average SR #4,051 2.43*
- Average accuracy #2,585 94.77%
- Average score #5,012 462,425
- Total score #5,082 462,425
- Oldest #1 #553 Nobuo Uematsu - To Zanarkand [Normal] (28-04-2014)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.