Mr_Ente
Joined 25-04-2020
13,668,277 score to level 33
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,567 0pp
- Accuracy #7,005 93.73%
- Plays #6,469 377
- Level #4,668 32.34
- Ranked score #5,662 192,709,238
- Total score #9,546 220,411,723
- Medals #126 13
- Replays watched #187 0
- Maps played #2,633 294
- Account age #40,644 #16,844,522
- #1s #242 2
- Weighted pp #3,999 18pp
- Average pp #4,345 9pp
- Average SR #3,185 2.78*
- Average accuracy #4,432 85.50%
- Average score #4,272 891,441
- Total score #3,936 1,782,882
- Oldest #1 #2,307 Chi Guo (CV: Ke Ke Wei) - Liu Guang Zhi Yu [Normal] (31-05-2020)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
13 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 3/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.