CxZww

Joined 29-05-2020

Level 21 22%

6,965,177 score to level 22

Global
-
Country
-
peak #5,985 13 Jun 2020
pp
0pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#237 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
34,947,088
Hit accuracy
93.21%
Play count
303
Play time
8h
Total score
61,564,823
Total hits
36,590
Maximum combo
573
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
11
Highest rank
#1,204,972
SS
0
SS
2
S
0
S
19
A
28
About
read 21d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
5
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
134
Global rank, 90 days

1d ago #1,476,015

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

11 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 1/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 2/13

Skill & Dedication 7/96

Rank history

Not enough days recorded.

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #10,511

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.