MrHyde122
Joined 03-08-2012
4,918,930 score to level 29
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 1
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,431 0pp
- Accuracy #5,284 94.77%
- Plays #6,168 666
- Level #5,042 28.69
- Ranked score #9,886 52,377,368
- Total score #10,963 153,421,070
- Medals #136 2
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #2,878 42
- Account age #1,657 #1,811,067
- #1s #242 1
- Weighted pp #4,167 15pp
- Average pp #3,533 15pp
- Average SR #4,239 2.35*
- Average accuracy #477 98.54%
- Average score #5,239 325,202
- Total score #5,270 325,202
- Oldest #1 #409 Triple Booking - Yamato Nadeshiko Education (TV Size) [Easy] (18-08-2013)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
2 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 1/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 0/13
Skill & Dedication 1/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.