t_the_tree

Joined 29-08-2020

Level 34 20%

18,652,872 score to level 35

Global
#1,336,439
Country
#3,936
peak #9,000 26 Nov 2020
pp
401pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
58,640,494
Hit accuracy
86.08%
Play count
1,473
Play time
31h
Total score
260,997,128
Total hits
216,885
Maximum combo
453
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
32
Highest rank
#1,242,390
SS
0
SS
0
S
0
S
4
A
41
About
read 18d ago
Playstyle
mouse, keyboard
Followers
4
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
892
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,304,384

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

32 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 6/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 9/13

Skill & Dedication 15/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #1,336,439

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #10,022

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.