paperlapap

Joined 28-01-2021

Level 27 35%

9,544,801 score to level 28

Global
#1,360,545
Country
#3,838
peak #7,094 21 Feb 2021
pp
388pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#239 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
46,868,157
Hit accuracy
93.89%
Play count
431
Play time
10h
Total score
132,835,199
Total hits
67,082
Maximum combo
408
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
8
Highest rank
#1,177,706
SS
0
SS
5
S
0
S
20
A
34
About
read 22d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
4
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
172
Global rank, 90 days

today #1,319,810

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

8 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 2/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64

Mod Introduction 0/13

Skill & Dedication 5/96

Rank history

21-09-2026 #1,360,545

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #10,243

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.