SirShello
Joined 16-02-2021
19,397,037 score to level 38
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 7
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,459 0pp
- Accuracy #5,011 94.96%
- Plays #6,354 486
- Level #4,213 37.30
- Ranked score #6,095 162,230,298
- Total score #8,056 339,132,963
- Medals #127 11
- Replays watched #186 0
- Maps played #2,738 180
- Account age #51,344 #21,139,195
- #1s #228 7
- Weighted pp #2,399 78pp
- Average pp #3,887 12pp
- Average SR #4,652 2.17*
- Average accuracy #580 98.36%
- Average score #3,489 1,397,619
- Total score #2,175 9,783,334
- Oldest #1 #2,790 Sakakibara Yui - Answer [Easy] (11-05-2021)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
11 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 2/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 1/13
Skill & Dedication 7/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.