GeePanda
Joined 24-11-2012
14,405,177 score to level 59
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 4
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,453 0pp
- Accuracy #13,728 90.35%
- Plays #3,644 3,909
- Level #2,466 58.78
- Ranked score #4,069 375,377,311
- Total score #4,357 1,337,284,824
- Medals #116 22
- Replays watched #186 0
- Maps played #2,070 855
- Account age #2,108 #2,122,808
- #1s #234 4
- Weighted pp #3,335 33pp
- Average pp #4,420 9pp
- Average SR #4,677 2.16*
- Average accuracy #2,705 94.44%
- Average score #4,043 1,030,335
- Total score #3,033 4,121,341
- Oldest #1 #1,299 Sara - Qing An Jing De Wang Ji Wo [Normal] (11-03-2017)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
22 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 4/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 1/64
Mod Introduction 3/13
Skill & Dedication 14/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.