PolishCow10
Joined 21-02-2021
60,332,937 score to level 80
- Global
- -
- pp
- 0pp
- Swiss #1s
- 2
Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,409 0pp
- Accuracy #4,705 95.18%
- Plays #3,270 4,657
- Level #1,335 79.51
- Ranked score #2,322 1,008,535,378
- Total score #2,699 3,321,026,416
- Medals #109 29
- Replays watched #185 0
- Maps played #1,488 1,534
- Account age #51,686 #21,280,634
- #1s #237 2
- Weighted pp #3,387 30pp
- Average pp #3,487 15pp
- Average SR #3,659 2.57*
- Average accuracy #2,323 95.29%
- Average score #4,371 826,789
- Total score #4,002 1,653,577
- Oldest #1 #2,829 Sakaguchi Ami - Central (TV Size) [Normal] (24-05-2021)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
29 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 0/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 6/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64
Mod Introduction 5/13
Skill & Dedication 16/96
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.