Swiss #1s
Statistics
Swiss ranks
- pp #8,413 0pp
- Accuracy #3,604 95.95%
- Plays #3,387 4,425
- Level #1,517 75.49
- Ranked score #2,195 1,098,604,171
- Total score #2,943 2,840,002,730
- Medals #105 33
- Replays watched #161 24
- Maps played #2,437 482
- Account age #2,196 #2,156,291
- #1s #213 26
- Weighted pp #947 489pp
- Average pp #2,099 30pp
- Average SR #3,038 2.83*
- Average accuracy #1,192 97.36%
- Average score #3,436 1,426,103
- Total score #1,148 37,078,665
- Oldest #1 #404 Giorgio Vanni e Cristina D'Avena - Roba da Gatti! (TV Size) [Cyborg M] (27-07-2013)
- Global #1s #9 0
Medals
33 of 352
Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7
Beatmap Packs 16/80
Beatmap Spotlights 0/22
Hush-Hush 6/70
Hush-Hush (Expert) 0/64
Mod Introduction 2/13
Skill & Dedication 9/96
Beatmaps
The sets this player has favourited on osu!. Read when I last swept them, so a very recent upload can be missing.
Shano x 40mP - Natsukoi Hanabi 4 difficulties- Mapper
- Frostmourne
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 4.20*
- Plays
- 548,250
- Favourites
- 258
- Ranked
- 04-10-2013
Shinji Orito, Magome Togoshi, Jun Maeda - Uminari 3 difficulties- Mapper
- osuplayer111
- Status
- ranked
- Hardest
- 3.97*
- Plays
- 394,762
- Favourites
- 210
- Ranked
- 24-10-2009
Top plays over time
Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.
The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.































































































































































































































































































































































