WoLFz_07

Joined 06-03-2021

Level 51 74%

13,286,177 score to level 52

Global
#646,662
Country
#1,989
peak #2,504 14 Jan 2022
pp
1,508pp
Swiss #1s
0

Swiss #1s

#1s
0
#240 in CH
Also world #1
0
#9 in CH
Weighted pp
-
Average pp
-
Average SR
-
Average accuracy
-
Last 7 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost
Last 30 days
+0 / -0
gained / lost

Statistics

Statistics
Ranked score
239,188,065
Hit accuracy
90.94%
Play count
1,843
Play time
34h
Total score
910,493,823
Total hits
369,352
Maximum combo
602
Replays watched by others
0
Medals
19
Highest rank
#553,350
SS
0
SS
3
S
0
S
11
A
68
About
read 4d ago

Nothing filled in.

Followers
1
Mapping followers
0
Kudosu
0
Forum posts
0
Maps played
356
Global rank, 90 days

today #644,144

Play history
Replays watched

Nobody has watched a replay of this player.

Swiss ranks

Medals

19 of 352

Beatmap Challenge Packs 0/7

Beatmap Packs 0/80

Beatmap Spotlights 0/22

Hush-Hush 0/70

Hush-Hush (Expert) 2/64

Mod Introduction 4/13

Skill & Dedication 13/96

Rank history

17-09-2026 #646,662

Monthly pp since 2014

01-09-2026 #3,340

Rebuilt on the first of each month from the scores I hold, under the pp system live then. Bonus pp is an estimate. Every Swiss player that month

Top plays over time

Nothing at that depth yet. A career is ranked against itself in the background, so the first look can come up empty.

The figure is what the play was worth when it reached its best place, under the pp system live then; in brackets is what osu! says it is worth today, where a rework has moved it. A play's place can only get worse while a pp system runs, so the place shown is the one it reached the moment it arrived: when it was set, or when a rework re-priced everything in its favour. Plays osu! has dropped are here too, from what osu!track saw. These values are reconstructed, not osu!'s own. osu! does not publish what a play was worth in the past, so every historical figure here is recomputed from the map file under the pp system of the day, and lands within a few pp of the real number rather than on it. Two plays within about 5% of each other can therefore be listed the wrong way round.